- About About
Medical Patient Resources Becoming a State-Authorized Patient Talking to your doctor Which conditions qualify? The Medical Cannabis Patient’s Guide for U.S. Travel Patient's Guide to CBD Patient's Guide to Medical Cannabis Guide to Using Medical Cannabis Condition-based Booklets Growing Cannabis Cannabis Tincture, Salve, Butter and Oil Recipes Leaf411 Affordability Program Tracking Treatment & Gathering Data with Releaf App Medical Professional Resources CME for Medical Professionals Cannabis Safety Medical Cannabis Research
- Legal Legal
Advocacy ASA Chapters Start an ASA Chapter Take Action Campaigns No Patient Left Behind End Pain, Not Lives Vote Medical Marijuana Medical Cannabis Advocate's Training Center Resources for Tabling and Lobby Days Strategic Planning Civics 101 Strategic Messaging Citizen Lobbying Participating in Implementation Movement Building Organizing a Demonstration Organizing Turnout for Civic Meetings Public Speaking Media 101 Patient's History of Medical Cannabis
- News News
Policy Model Federal Legislation Download Ending The Federal Conflict Public Comments by ASA Industry Standards Guide to Regulating Industry Standards Recognizing Science using the Data Quality Act Fact Sheet on ASA's Data Quality Act Petition to HHS Data Quality Act Briefs ASA Data Quality Act petition to HHS Information on Lawyers and Named Patients in the Data Quality Act Lawsuit Reports 2020 State of the States Medical Cannabis in America Medical Cannabis Access for Pain Treatment
- Join Join
Sandy Almendarez, Natural Products INSIDER
While the botanical has been popular in the United States for centuries, January 2014 saw a bump in cannabis discussion with New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announcing that the state will be the 22nd state to offer medical marijuana to select patients. Plus, Colorado's Amendment 64 was implemented allowing adults (21 years and older) to grow, possess and use marijuana. At the end of February, business was clearly booming in Colorado. Gov. John W. Hickenlooper revamped his budget based on taxes the state has already collected from marijuana sales. He estimated the state’s marijuana industry could produce close to USD $134 million in taxes and fees for the State in the next fiscal year. The estimate proposed to voters when the initiative was on the ballot in 2013 was $70 million.
And The New York Times reported in Washington, where retail sales of marijuana will begin in June, budget forecasters estimated marijuana could bring the state nearly $190 million in taxes for the four years beginning in mid 2015.
Demand is high not only for its well-known psychotropic effects, but also for its health benefits, which have been demonstrated in hundreds of studies. A 2012 review from the Hannover Medical School in Germany reported cannabis has antispastic, analgesic, antinausea, neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory actions, and is effective against certain psychiatric diseases (Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 July; 109(29-30): 495–501). Its legal, safe use could bring relief to those who suffer from a number of ailments.
In fact, synthetic cannabinoids have been available with a prescription in the United States since the 1980s. Dronabinol, available in the United States and Canada. Dronabinol a pure isomer of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive constituent of the cannabis is sold as Marinol (from Solvay Pharmaceuticals and also distributed by PAR Pharmaceutical Companies) to treat anorexia in AIDS patients and to treat refractory nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy patients.
During this critical beginning stage of the legal marijuana industry, safety is crucial. CBS News reported Barbara Brohl, executive director of the Colorado department of revenue, as saying marijuana testing rules are still being finalized; she said she expected the state to start requiring mandatory testing of products in summer 2014.
Without legal, binding rules for safe manufacturing, it's up to responsible industry to come up with its own quality testing standards. It sounds a lot like the natural products industry before 2007 when FDA finalized its GMPs (good manufacturing practices) for dietary supplements.
It reasons that Americans for Safe Access (ASA), an organization working to ensure safe and legal access to cannabis for therapeutic uses and research, turned to the supplement industry for guidance. Steph Sherer, ASA's executive director, said the organization started working with the American Herbal Products Association (AHPA) in 2010 to develop GMPs for the cannabis industry.
AHPA, through its Cannabis Committee, drafted regulatory recommendations and manufacturing guides for several states that legalized medical and recreational marijuana. The recommendations detail best practices for distribution, including product acquisition, facility maintenance, security and personnel training.
"Since we've been working with AHPA, every state that has moved into implementing new state laws has adopted their recommendations for regulators," Sherer said.
Michael McGuffin, president of AHPA, said the organization got involved because, "The industry said we needed to focus attention on this. These companies believe they are engaged in lawful business within the states, but they realized they didn't have consistency in their regulatory approach. It was a notable gap identified to us, and we have skills in that area."
The American Herbal Pharmacopoeia (AHP) also played a large role by creating a cannabis monograph to establish standards for the botanical's identity, purity, analysis and quality. Finalized in December 2013, the monograph also provides information of cannabis' cultivation, storage and preparation.
"The AHP cannabis monograph establishes a standard of quality," McGuffin said. "It doesn’t set a regulatory requirement, but there will be a call for suppliers to meet the monograph, even though there's no legal requirement."
Sherer said the monograph allows the cannabis industry to create testing standards in the legal cannabis states. AHP's monograph is mentioned by name in the Nevada, Washington and Colorado regulations, Sherer said.
With that guidance, ASA launched a certification similar to supplement third-party GMP certifications. In December 2013 ASA released the Patient Focused Certification (PFC) program based on a combination of state regulations, AHPA's GMPs standards and the AHP monograph. Certification includes a paperwork audit to ensure companies have the licensing required to operate legally; a training audit to ensure employees have necessary training; and a physical audit of manufacturers, cultivators, dispensaries and laboratories. ASA will conduct at least one surprise physical audit each year.
ASA certified the first two dispensaries in late February to Berkeley Patients Group and SPARC of San Francisco. Sherer said ASA is currently working with 20 more companies that are going through the training and audits to become certified.
McGuffin pointed out some cannabis companies have figured out their own GMPs and other manufacturing processes that adhere to safe, quality controls. "There are some well-established companies making products that are likely to be in compliance with whatever regulations come into being," he said.
But still, formal regulations would allow the industry to thrive, he said. "If this is a meaningful, emerging market and marketable product, then the faster these companies look like any other business in terms of consistent regulation and compliance with regulation, the more likely they'll succeed and survive."