- About About
Medical Patient Resources Becoming a State-Authorized Patient Talking to your doctor The Medical Cannabis Patient’s Guide for U.S. Travel Patient's Guide to CBD Patient's Guide to Medical Cannabis Guide to Using Medical Cannabis Condition-based Booklets Growing Cannabis Cannabis Tincture, Salve, Butter and Oil Recipes Leaf411 Affordability Program Tracking Treatment & Gathering Data with Releaf App Medical Professional Resources CME for Medical Professionals Cannabis Safety Medical Cannabis Research
- Legal Legal
Advocacy ASA Chapters Start an ASA Chapter Take Action Campaigns No Patient Left Behind End Pain, Not Lives Vote Medical Marijuana Medical Cannabis Advocate's Training Center Resources for Tabling and Lobby Days Strategic Planning Civics 101 Strategic Messaging Citizen Lobbying Participating in Implementation Movement Building Organizing a Demonstration Organizing Turnout for Civic Meetings Public Speaking Media 101 Patient's History of Medical Cannabis
Policy Model Federal Legislation Download Ending The Federal Conflict Public Comments by ASA Industry Standards Guide to Regulating Industry Standards Recognizing Science using the Data Quality Act Fact Sheet on ASA's Data Quality Act Petition to HHS Data Quality Act Briefs ASA Data Quality Act petition to HHS Information on Lawyers and Named Patients in the Data Quality Act Lawsuit Reports 2020 State of the States Medical Cannabis in America Medical Cannabis Access for Pain Treatment
- Join Join
Volume 5, Issue 5
Activist Workshop Follows Clinical ConferenceMedical cannabis activists from across the country participated last month in the launch of ASA's new National Strategy to secure safe access for all Americans by 2013. The two-day workshop in Warwick, Rhode Island followed the Sixth National Clinical Conference on Cannabis Therapeutics, sponsored by Patients Out of Time.
ASA's core strategy recognizes that the changing of Federal law will likely not happen without a much stronger national grassroots base demanding safe access for all Americans. With this in mind, ASA national staff led activists through a series of trainings and discussions on everything from strategic planning to lobbying and media training.
Small groups with representatives from states both with and without medical cannabis laws facilitated dialog on anticipating and resolving issues with implementing safe access. Activists from New Jersey, Maryland, Michigan, California and Maine were able to discuss what is working and what's not with each other, as well as representatives from states without patient protections, such as Tennessee and Florida.
'Having patients and activists from so many parts of the country helped everyone gain a better sense of what's possible and what's difficult,' said Caren Woodson, ASA's Government Affairs Director. 'ASA's national strategy to mobilize the grassroots is providing them with key support. They know they're not alone in the process.'
ASA's strategy focuses on the specific needs and constraints of individual states within a framework of national impact. Workshop participants learned how their work toward passing meaningful medical cannabis legislation in more states and successfully implementing local medical cannabis laws links to the passage of Federal initiatives that will grant access to all Americans who need it. ASA staff explained how increasing the nationwide grassroots base helps put constant local pressure to pass comprehensive federal legislation, as does effectively implementing the current medical cannabis laws in 15 states and the District of Columbia.
The guided process -- facilitated by ASA Executive Director Steph Sherer, Legal Coordinator Lauren Payne, and Elizabeth Mewhiney and Caren Woodson from ASA's Government Affairs office - helped activists identify specific goals and create local action plans appropriate for their area.
'Criticizing what happens in a particular state as either too permissive or too restrictive is easy from the outside,' said Woodson. 'But after hearing the local truth from activists on the ground, people were able to keep a more open mind about the big picture -- achieving national access.'
ASA's legal and government affairs staff also unveiled how they will apply direct pressure for change on the national level. ASA's government affairs office is building on momentum with the Obama Administration and Congress to fix harmful federal policies on asset forfeiture, drug classification, and cannabis research. Meanwhile, the ASA legal team is pursuing pivotal medical cannabis litigation that can guarantee safe access nationwide, including ASA's Data Quality Act petition and another to 'reschedule' cannabis to a classification that would remove barriers to research and medical use.
'What's most exciting about this is seeing the grassroots take ownership of the process,' said Woodson. 'Medical cannabis patients are realizing how to move forward together as a community to accomplish safe access for everyone. ASA is building a strong grassroots now to prepare for the coming victory.'
Council Passes Measure, Congress Has 30-Day ReviewAfter a wait of more than a decade, residents of Washington, D.C. who use medical cannabis should soon enjoy some legal protections. The District Council early this month passed a bill that will regulate and enact Initiative 59, the Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative, which voters approved in 1998 but was blocked by an act of Congress. That Congressional ban was lifted earlier this year.
In the final vote on amendments to the bill, the Council relented on a restrictive provision that would limit personal possession to no more than two ounces per month. Lobbying by patients and ASA staff -- including Executive Director Steph Sherer, who is a D.C. resident - convinced them to give the District Mayor discretion to increase that limit to four ounces. Other amendments to prevent the denial of employment or housing, to allow personal cultivation, and to ensure distribution centers are operated on a nonprofit basis were each rejected.
'We are certainly excited to help implement a bill that has taken 11 years to see the light of day,' said Sherer. 'But the Council's failure to listen to patients' needs will have serious unintended effects that may take years to correct.'
The implementation bill's ban on personal cultivation while allowing for-profit distribution centers has been a particularly cause for concern among activists.
'This policy will set a precedent that placed the needs of shareholders over those of patients,' said Sherer.
Since Congress lifted the ban on implementing Initiative 59 in December, the District Council has moved swiftly to implement the law. The 'Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative Amendment Act of 2010,' was co-introduced earlier this year by District Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray (D) and Councilmembers David A. Catania (I-At Large) and Phil Mendelson (D-At Large).
A final vote on the measure has not yet been scheduled, but passage and signing by the Mayor is expected soon. Under the Home Rule Act, the bill then goes before Congress for a mandatory 30-day review period, as with all local laws in Washington D.C.
Proposed D.C. legislation to implement I-59
ASA's suggested amendments
Text of I-59, passed in 1998
ASA Legal Challenge Gets Relocation Rule RemovedThe nation's second-largest city will have regulations in effect for the distribution of medical cannabis next month, after the Los Angeles City Council voted 9-1 to approve final amendments to a local dispensary ordinance it passed earlier this year. While the restrictive provisions on where and how many dispensing collectives may operate will result in the closure of hundreds of dispensaries, legal action by ASA resulted in the removal of a particularly onerous provision.
As originally approved, the ordinance required dispensary operators to find a new location within seven days after the law took effect. ASA's lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles argued this was a violation of due process, and the City Attorney's office quietly dropped the language from the final ordinance. ASA had filed suit on behalf of Venice Beach Care Center and PureLife Alternative Wellness Center, two dispensaries that have operated in Los Angeles since before the city's widely ignored 2007 moratorium.
'Our legal challenge forced the city to improve its medical marijuana dispensary ordinance,' said ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford. 'But the battle is far from over. The buffer zones and other location restrictions are so onerous and complicated that they throw into question whether any dispensaries will be able to fully comply with the ordinance.'
In order to comply with the ordinance, dispensaries must be located at least 1,000 feet from schools, parks, libraries, churches and other so-called 'sensitive uses.' Dispensaries are also prohibited from locating next to or across the street from residential property, which excludes almost all of the city's commercial zones. The Planning Department has yet to produce maps showing where in the city a dispensary can be located, despite official requests from the city council.
The removal of the requirement to move within seven days was ASA's second victory in the regulatory process in L.A. In November, when the council was considering banning any cash sale of medical marijuana, ASA threatened to file suit and the council crafted compromise language. Even so, the L.A. City Attorney has filed nuisance abatement actions against two dispensaries, Organica and Holistic Caregivers, accusing them of engaging in illegal sales of medical marijuana. ASA is currently considering its legal options after a Los Angeles Superior Court judge on Tuesday granted the city's motion for preliminary injunction.
'This amended ordinance gives dispensaries up to six months to find a suitable location,' said Elford. 'The city ought to think twice about taking action against any dispensaries before they have had a chance to comply with the new regulation.'
Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa signed the final ordinance at the end of April; it goes into effect 30 days after being signed.
Amendments to L.A. medical marijuana dispensary ordinance
L.A. medical marijuana dispensary ordinance without amendment
Lawsuit filed by ASA against the City of Los Angeles
ASA was well represented last month at the International Cannabis and Hemp Expo at the San Francisco Cow Palace. The ASA booth included representatives from the national office in Oakland, as well as four local chapters: San Francisco, Sonoma County, Silicon Valley, and East Bay. The over 15,000 participants who attended the expo learned about ASA's extensive work on behalf of medical cannabis, many for the first time. David Goldman and Michael Koehn, pictured here, were among the San Francisco ASA chapter members helping out.
The Fresno ASA chapter participated last month in a local cancer research walk to benefit St. Jude's. Fresno ASA also staffed a booth at the event, where they distributed ASA pamphlets and helped educate participants on the medical benefits of cannabis. All profits from the event will be donated to St. Jude's.
The San Luis Obispo ASA chapter launched their first chapter community outreach at the Atascadero Earth Day event in April, distributing cards and information. Organizers report that the day went well, with many people surprised but happy to see a local ASA chapter. One of the candidates for sheriff stopped by with lots of questions, as did an Atascadero City Council member. After speaking with a chapter member, the councilmember said she realized the Council had not been given the full picture of patient's rights in California and said they had made a mistake. She promised to go back to the Council to re-address their dispensary ban.
The Sonoma ASA Chapter joined in hosting a Medical Cannabis Forum to hear from candidates for District Attorney. The room was filled to capacity (over 135 people), but those turned away were able to see the debate streaming live on the internet courtesy of the local paper, The Press Democrat. Moderated by Sonoma County Public Defender Joe Rogoway, the debate included questions for the candidates on local guidelines and prosecution standards for medical cannabis patients, collectives, cooperatives, and dispensaries, as well as California's November ballot initiative. Both candidates expressed a strong commitment to patient access.
Sonoma Alliance for Medical Marijuana (SAMM) was the other host for the debate, which was sponsored by the California Law Institute, Sonoma Patients Group, Peace in Medicine, and Organicann.