IMPORTANT UPDATE: On APRIL 28th, 2026, the Attorney General ordered the Rescheduling of Cannabis in the state medical cannabis programs from Schedule I to Schedule III through AG Order No. 6754-2026. Learn more about what this means for patients and caregivers here! 

All other cannabis remains illegal and is classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act  

MEDICAL CANNABIS PATIENTS AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT:

ONLY FEDERAL REFORM CAN END THIS CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS

Medical cannabis patients in the United States are facing a quiet constitutional crisis. They are being forced to choose between their health and their Second Amendment rights. This isn’t some hypothetical slippery slope—this is current federal law.

Under the Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S. Code § 922), it is illegal for any “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” to purchase, possess, or receive a firearm 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). Cannabis, still classified as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 812(c)), falls under that definition—even for those who are legally using it under their state’s medical cannabis programs.

THE RESULT?

Tens of millions of Americans are being stripped of their constitutional rights for following their doctor’s advice.

MYTH: “THIS ONLY APPLIES TO PATIENTS ON A STATE REGISTRY”

This is one of the most persistent—and dangerous—misunderstandings. Many patients believe they are protected from federal firearm restrictions as long as they avoid registering with their state medical cannabis program.

FALSE: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) explicitly states in its firearms transaction form (Form 4473) that any cannabis use—regardless of state legality—makes a person ineligible to purchase or possess a firearm.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) explicitly states in Form 4473—which must be completed for all firearm purchases through licensed dealers—that any cannabis use (even if legal under state law) makes someone a prohibited person under federal law.

Form 4473 - Question 21(f):
Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?

Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law, regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside

This includes patients who:

  • Have a physician’s recommendation for cannabis;
  • Use cannabis as part of a legal state program;
  • Are not registered in any state database.

If you answer “No” while using medical cannabis—even legally under state law—you risk federal perjury charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, a felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison.

THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE: CONFLICTING LAWS AND COURT CONFUSION

The contradiction between state and federal law has led to court cases across the country. Federal judges have delivered mixed rulings, and while some courts have expressed concern over infringing on fundamental rights, no decision has overturned the federal prohibition in a way that protects all patients.

In U.S. v. Daniels and U.S. v. Harrison, courts explored whether cannabis use justifies denying gun rights under the Constitution. Yet the overarching federal stance remains: medical cannabis use equals unlawful use, period.

MEDICAL PATIENTS ARE NOT CRIMINALS

Here’s what’s really going on: federal law equates medical cannabis patients with drug abusers, despite growing scientific consensus and over 30 years of state-level medical cannabis programs proving the opposite.

These are cancer survivors, veterans with PTSD, people living with epilepsy, Crohn’s, or multiple sclerosis. Their use is medicinal, not criminal. Yet they are barred from exercising a core constitutional right based on an outdated federal definition.

This is discrimination based on medical choice.

A FEDERAL FIX IS THE ONLY SOLUTION

Until Congress acts, no amount of state reform will fix this.

Rescheduling cannabis under the Controlled Substances Act won’t automatically restore Second Amendment rights either. The solution is comprehensive federal legislation.

This isn’t about creating new rights—it’s about restoring the ones already guaranteed.

THE BOTTOM LINE

We cannot ask patients to choose between relief and rights. The federal government should not disarm Americans who rely on cannabis for medical purposes.

It’s time for Congress to pass legislation that fixes this once and for all.

Because no one should have to give up their Second Amendment rights to stop a seizure, ease chronic pain, or survive cancer.

Take Action Today! 

 

Educate your community: Download, Print, and Post 

 

If you appreciate ASA's work, sign up to get alerts and updates and make a donation to support ASA's vital mission.