- About About
Medical Patient Resources Becoming a State-Authorized Patient Talking to your doctor Which conditions qualify? The Medical Cannabis Patient’s Guide for U.S. Travel Patient's Guide to CBD Patient's Guide to Medical Cannabis Guide to Using Medical Cannabis Condition-based Booklets Growing Cannabis Cannabis Tincture, Salve, Butter and Oil Recipes Leaf411 Affordability Program Tracking Treatment & Gathering Data with Releaf App Medical Professional Resources CME for Medical Professionals Cannabis Safety Medical Cannabis Research
- Legal Legal
Advocacy ASA Chapters Start an ASA Chapter Take Action Campaigns No Patient Left Behind End Pain, Not Lives Vote Medical Marijuana Medical Cannabis Advocate's Training Center Resources for Tabling and Lobby Days Strategic Planning Civics 101 Strategic Messaging Citizen Lobbying Participating in Implementation Movement Building Organizing a Demonstration Organizing Turnout for Civic Meetings Public Speaking Media 101 Patient's History of Medical Cannabis
- News News
Policy Model Federal Legislation Download Ending The Federal Conflict Public Comments by ASA Industry Standards Guide to Regulating Industry Standards Reports 2020 State of the States Medical Cannabis Access for Pain Treatment Medical Cannabis in America Recognizing Science using the Data Quality Act Fact Sheet on ASA's Data Quality Act Petition to HHS Data Quality Act Briefs ASA Data Quality Act petition to HHS Information on Lawyers and Named Patients in the Data Quality Act Lawsuit
- Join Join
ARCHIVE Published on: 2006-01-01
Tustin,CAmedical marijuana patient Michael Teague was raided by the Orange County Sheriff and DEA onApril 2, 2002for cultivating just over 100 plants. His case was dismissed in state court, at which point the federal government filed charges against him. Teague had a federal bench trial in February 2003 and was convicted of cultivation. He was then sentenced in June 2003 to 18 months in prison. While in prison, Teague attempted to appeal his federal conviction, and in October 2004, on Teague's behalf, ASA filed amotion for release on bail pending appeal. Teague was refused release on bail pending his appeal, but was soon let out of prison on supervised release. ASA then filed anappealin July 2005 on behalf of Teague raising three issues:
- Violation of his due process rights because of appellate delay
- Violation of the Tenth Amendment
- The improper sentence of four years of supervised release.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed Teague’s conviction, but reversed his sentence and remanded the case to district court for re-sentencing. On remand, the district court stated that it would terminate Teague's term of supervised released if he performed adequately and reapplied in one-year.This happened and, onSeptember 24, 2007, the court terminated early Teague’s supervised release.
- Teague motion for release on bail pending appeal(filed10/2/04)
- Teague appeal brief(filed7/28/05)
- Teague reply brief(filed9/26/05)