- About About
Medical Patient Resources Becoming a State-Authorized Patient Talking to your doctor Which conditions qualify? The Medical Cannabis Patient’s Guide for U.S. Travel Patient's Guide to CBD Patient's Guide to Medical Cannabis Guide to Using Medical Cannabis Condition-based Booklets Growing Cannabis Cannabis Tincture, Salve, Butter and Oil Recipes Leaf411 Affordability Program Tracking Treatment & Gathering Data with Releaf App Medical Professional Resources CME for Medical Professionals Cannabis Safety Medical Cannabis Research
- Legal Legal
Advocacy ASA Chapters Start an ASA Chapter Take Action Campaigns No Patient Left Behind End Pain, Not Lives Vote Medical Marijuana Medical Cannabis Advocate's Training Center Resources for Tabling and Lobby Days Strategic Planning Civics 101 Strategic Messaging Citizen Lobbying Participating in Implementation Movement Building Organizing a Demonstration Organizing Turnout for Civic Meetings Public Speaking Media 101 Patient's History of Medical Cannabis
- News News
Policy Model Federal Legislation Download Ending The Federal Conflict Public Comments by ASA Industry Standards Guide to Regulating Industry Standards Recognizing Science using the Data Quality Act Fact Sheet on ASA's Data Quality Act Petition to HHS Data Quality Act Briefs ASA Data Quality Act petition to HHS Information on Lawyers and Named Patients in the Data Quality Act Lawsuit Reports 2020 State of the States Medical Cannabis in America Medical Cannabis Access for Pain Treatment
- Join Join
By Matt Ferner Huffington Post
Voters in the two earliest presidential voting states overwhelmingly agree: states should be able to set their own marijuana laws without federal interference
Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling asked voters in Iowa and New Hampshire if states should be able to execute their own marijuana laws without the involvement of the federal government, or if the feds should arrest and prosecute those who are following state drug laws.
The survey, released Tuesday, found a supermajority of voters in both states believe that the feds should not interfere with state marijuana laws -- 71 percent in Iowa and 73 percent in New Hampshire.
Iowa and New Hampshire are often viewed as critical bellwether states, together helping to cement each party's presidential front-runner. The Iowa caucus in the first week of February serves as the launch into election season, quickly followed the next week by the first primary election in New Hampshire.
The PPP poll also found substantial bipartisan support for states' rights when it comes to marijuana policy, with very large Democratic and independent majorities leading in both states, but with strong majority support from Republicans as well.
Presidential hopefuls should take note of how strongly these voters want to end federal marijuana prohibition, Tom Angell, chairman of Marijuana Majority, a drug policy reform group that commissioned the PPP poll, said in a statement.
"Candidates who say they would send in the DEA to shut down legal, taxpaying marijuana businesses are effectively announcing that they're out of the mainstream and out of touch with the voters they need support from in order to get elected," Angell said. "That type of rhetoric is just not going to score any points in 2016."
To date, 23 states have legalized marijuana for medical purposes while 17 others have legalized the limited medical use of cannabis extracts, frequently used to treat debilitating seizures. New Hampshire legalized medical marijuana in 2013, and Iowa is one of the states that allows limited medical use of extracts.
Four states and D.C. have legalized recreational marijuana. (The District still bans retail sales.)
But marijuana, be it medical or recreational, remains prohibited under federal law. Under the Controlled Substances Act, the U.S. has five categories for drugs and drug ingredients. Schedule I is reserved for what the DEA considers to have the highest potential for abuse and no medical value. Marijuana has been classified as Schedule I for decades, alongside other substances like heroin and LSD.
States that have legalized rely on Department of Justice guidance urging federal prosecutors to refrain from targeting their state-legal marijuana operations.
While federal prosecutions of medical marijuana patients and providers have slowed more recently, the Drug Enforcement Administration and several U.S. attorneys under the Obama administration have raided marijuana dispensaries and sent people to prison, even though they complied with state laws. According to a 2013 report released by advocacy group Americans for Safe Access, the Obama administration spent almost $80 million each year -- more than $200,000 per day -- cracking down on medical marijuana.
The PPP poll is some of the strongest sentiment yet from voters who want to see an end to prohibition-style marijuana policies. In April, CBS News found that 58 percent of Americans believe that legalizing marijuana should be left to each state, without involvement from the federal government. A recent report from centrist think tank Third Way found 60 percent of Americans feeling similarly and also found that a larger majority of Americans would also support the creation of a new federal law that would make those marijuana-legal states a "safe haven" from federal laws against cannabis.
State legislators also appear to agree -- just this month, the National Conference of State Legislatures, a nongovernment organization composed of state lawmakers and their staffs, passed a resolution urging the federal government to amend the Controlled Substances Act and other federal laws "to explicitly allow states to set their own marijuana and hemp policies without federal interference" and to refrain from undermining state marijuana and hemp laws.
The PPP surveys included 1,500 registered voters in Iowa and 841 voters in New Hampshire. The Iowa poll was conducted Aug. 7-9 and the New Hampshire poll was conducted Aug. 21-24.