<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>ASA</title>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/</link>
    <description>Americans for Safe Access ensures safe access and legal access to medical cannabis (medical marijuana) for therapeutic uses and research.</description>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.angeljustice.org/article.php?list=type&amp;type=45</link>
    <title>Information on Raich v. Gonzales as the Ninth Circuit Court reconsiders case remanded by the U.S. Supreme Court</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering aspects of Raich v. Gonzales not addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The issues which were heard and are due to be ruled on are medical necessity defense and substantive due process. &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.angeljustice.org/article.php?list=type&amp;type=45</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://safeaccessnow.org/article.php?list=type&amp;type=156</link>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules Against Raich</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;On June 6, 2005, the United States Supreme Court ruled to reverse the lower court's ruling on &lt;a href=&quot;article.php?list=type&amp;type=97&quot;&gt;Raich v. Ashcroft&lt;/a&gt;.  It means there are some circumstances where federal government can interfere with behavior that is legal according to state law.  The Court indicated that Congress and the Food and Drug Administration should work to resolve this issue.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <guid>http://safeaccessnow.org/article.php?list=type&amp;type=156</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.angeljustice.org/</link>
    <title>Angel's Fight to Stay Alive</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;How the Raich v. Ashcroft federal medical cannabis lawsuit born, and who is involved?&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.angeljustice.org/</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2004/11/23/raichVAshcroftAGuideToTheS.html</link>
    <title>Raich v. Ashcroft - A Guide to the Supreme Court Case
</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;A layperson's guide to the historic case of Raich v. Ashcroft -- a case that may have significant impact on the future of medical marijuana, states' rights, federal power, and the meaning of the commerce clause. Possibly the most important case in recent years. &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005</pubDate>
    <guid>http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2004/11/23/raichVAshcroftAGuideToTheS.html</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=2117</link>
    <title>Activists' Cases Riding on Raich and Booker</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt; The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Ashcroft v. Raich will have far-ranging consequences for medical cannabis patients, caregivers, growers and dispensary operators fighting federal marijuana charges.
Directly at stake are the homes, the businesses and the freedom of at least 30 defendants. Their cases were put on hold following a December 2003 ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals entitling Diane Monson and Angel Raich and her caregivers to use and cultivate marijuana under California law.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=2117</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=2116</link>
    <title>Supreme Court Could Alter Drug Cases</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;A decision in Ashcroft v. Raich is expected before the end of June 2005.  Here are some of the cases contingent on the ruling.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=2116</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/Raich_Oral.pdf</link>
    <title>Oral Arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;Read the transcript from the hearing of November 29, 2004, the final stage before the high court rules in the spring of 2005.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/Raich_Oral.pdf</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1445</link>
    <title>Watch the Montel Williams Show on medical marijuana!</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;Montel Williams, a medical marijuana patient himself, covers the bases in a full hour show with guests that include: Angel McClary Raich who has a case pending before the US Supreme Court, Irv Rosenfeld who is one of the federal government's IND patients, Rob Kampia from Marijuana Policy Project, and Donald Abrams, M.D. who does medical cannabis research at UCSF.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1445</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1444</link>
    <title>Protecting patients</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court will handle yet another case involving medical marijuana and federal law enforcement next fall. But Congress could make the issue moot this week - and express solidarity with popular opinion and the principles of federalism - by passing the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment to an appropriations bill, due for consideration today.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2004</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1444</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1443</link>
    <title>Medical Marijuana to Get Justices' Review</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court announced Monday that it would hear the Bush administration's claim that federal drug agents have the authority to arrest seriously ill Californians who use homegrown marijuana to relieve their pain.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1443</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1442</link>
    <title>U.S. Supreme Court will hear medical pot appeal</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court cast a cloud on the medical marijuana movement's biggest legal victory Monday when the justices agreed to hear the Bush administration's appeal of a ruling that protects marijuana patients in California from federal prosecution.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1442</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1441</link>
    <title>U.S. Supreme Court to rule on medical marijuana case</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday it would decide whether the government has the authority to prevent sick patients from using marijuana with a doctor's recommendation.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=1441</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=731</link>
    <title>Raich Case Update</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;San Francisco, Oct 7: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in a lawsuit by Prop. 215 patients Angel Raich and Diane Monson challenging the constitutionality of the federal government's ban on personal use and cultivation of marijuana for medicine under California law.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=731</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=684</link>
    <title>Controversial treatment: Wife, mother of two says she owes her life to medical marijuana</title>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2003</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=684</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=557</link>
    <title>U.S. Judge Rules Against Medical Pot Patients</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;Advocates of medical marijuana have lost another round in federal court in San Francisco. A  U.S. judge has turned down a bid by two patients for a preliminary injunction that would have protected them from federal prosecution for using marijuana to alleviate serious health problems.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=557</guid>
  </item>

</channel></rss>
