Researchers seek answers on medical marijuana

August 09, 2002

Jennifer Thomas, USA Today,

When Irvin Rosenfeld was a boy, he was stricken with a rare disease that caused tumors to grow on his bones, leaving him in constant, crippling pain. He underwent several surgeries to remove the tumors, but new ones grew back. He was prescribed all sorts of painkillers and muscle relaxants, but still he ached. Then, as a college student, Rosenfeld smoked marijuana for the first time. Almost immediately, he felt better than he had in years. Now a 48-year-old stockbroker in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. , Rosenfeld still has multiple congenital cartilaginous exostosis, a rare and painful genetic disease. And he believes the 12 marijuana cigarettes he smokes each day enable him to live a productive life. 'Without it, I would be on disability and homebound,' says Rosenfeld, one of eight Americans who legally smoke marijuana as part of an obscure federal initiative called the 'compassionate care' program. The program began in the 1970s but has since been closed to new participants. The use of marijuana to treat illness is still one of the thorniest issues confronting both the U.S. medical community and its legal system. And the volume on the debate is certain to be increased by Canada's action last month, when it become the first country to permit severely ill patients with a doctor's approval to apply to federal authorities for permission to grow and use the drug. American proponents of 'medical marijuana' say it's an unfairly vilified drug, one that can ease the nausea caused by chemotherapy, calm the tremors and muscle spasms of multiple sclerosis, and jump-start the appetite of people with AIDS who suffer from severe weight loss. Advocates also say the drug can relieve pressure in the eye that causes glaucoma, alleviate the pain of migraine headaches and arthritis, and ease the symptoms of a range of health problems, from insomnia to depression to pre-menstrual syndrome. Skeptics, however, say the drug's supporters are doing little more than blowing smoke. Smoking pot, the opponents note, increases your risk of lung cancer and emphysema. It can also produce serious side effects, including memory impairment and severe anxiety. 'We are afraid [promoting marijuana as medicine] will give the wrong message to kids that marijuana is good for you and it solves every problem,' says Alyse Booth, spokeswoman for the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University in New York City. Now, medical researchers are trying to determine once and for all whether marijuana has any beneficial properties. In laboratories around the world, they're seeking to tease out marijuana's precise effects on the body and whether there's a way to deliver the potential benefits without the harmful smoke. The University of California San Diego is home to the nation's first institute to study the medical uses of marijuana. Over the next three years, the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research will give out $9 million to researchers to conduct tests on the therapeutic value of marijuana. The initial studies include:
  • Two by researchers at UCSD and the University of California San Francisco, to test marijuana's ability to relieve the pain of peripheral neuropathy, a burning, tingling sensation that's the result of nerve damage in people with AIDS. Peripheral neuropathy has been difficult to treat with conventional methods, says Dr. Igor Grant, director of the cannabis research center.
  • One to examine whether smoking marijuana can relieve the painful muscle spasms and stiffness of multiple sclerosis.
  • Another to look at whether marijuana affects the driving ability of people with AIDS or multiple sclerosis. Many of the studies will involve smoking marijuana obtained from a National Institute on Drug Abuse marijuana farm at the University of Mississippi. The debate over medical marijuana gained urgency in 1996 when California voters passed Proposition 215, a referendum that legalized use of the drug for medical purposes. Since then, Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Maine, Oregon, Washington, Colorado and Nevada have passed similar laws, and several other states are considering them. In California and other states, so-called 'cannabis clubs' opened, dispensing marijuana to the ill. But there was still disagreement over who qualified for the drug and how it should be distributed. Many of the clubs later closed, shut by local authorities or sued by the federal government. In May, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that one of the clubs, the Oakland, Calif., Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, violated federal anti-drug laws by dispensing marijuana to patients whose doctors said they needed it. But the decision was limited to the Oakland cooperative's ability to distribute marijuana. It did not overturn Proposition 215 or similar initiatives passed by the other eight states. Meanwhile, researchers are trying to steer clear of the political and legal wrangling and let science supply the answers. Passage of Proposition 215 prompted the state of California, which is funding the UCSD marijuana research center, to launch a serious review of the drug, Grant says. 'The idea was that we really ought to have the best information available whether marijuana is useful or not,' before clearing the way for marijuana distribution to occur, Grant says. Even most anti-drug advocates think it's OK to study marijuana's usefulness as a medicine. Narcotics such as morphine are legitimate medicines when dispensed properly, Booth says. But she suspects that many medical marijuana advocates have an ulterior motive -- the legalization of the drug. 'A lot of marijuana activists have been smoking pot for a long time and think of it as a benign drug, and they don't want any legal repercussions,' Booth says. Many pro-marijuana activists don't dispute this. Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) Foundation, says there's already ample scientific proof that marijuana is safe and effective. 'There are over 12,000 government and private studies already published in medical journals about marijuana,' St. Pierre says. 'All they are going to keep doing is proving that marijuana is reasonably benign.' One such report was released by the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine in 1999. After an 18-month review of already published research on medical marijuana and testimony from doctors and patients, the report's authors concluded that the active components in marijuana appear to be helpful in treating pain, nausea, AIDS-related weight loss and muscle spasms in multiple sclerosis. The report also called for clinical trials to develop a means of administering marijuana without having to smoke it. But Grant says almost all the studies of medical marijuana have been small, involving few patients, and more research is needed, particularly in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling. 'The fact is, there have not been clinical trials meeting modern standards,' Grant says. 'It's becoming very clear that you need very strong medical science to back up the claim that cannabis is useful.'


  • Be the first to Comment

    Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.