Medical Marijuana Provider Sentenced to One Year in PrisonFederal judge lenient despite additional prison time sought by DOJ
Los Angeles, CA -- A medical marijuana dispensary operator
whose federal case has gained considerable attention in the media was
sentenced today to one year in prison and four years of supervised
release. Charles C. Lynch was convicted in 2008 under the Bush
Administration and had been awaiting sentencing under the new Obama
Administration. The sentence handed down by federal District Court
Judge George H. Wu is considered lenient given that the Justice
Department was seeking the mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years.
Despite indications of a new policy on medical marijuana, the Justice
Department refused to agree with defense attorneys' contention that
Lynch deserved a sentence of time served. Lynch is currently out on
bail pending his appeal, but cannot use medical marijuana according to
the terms of his release.
"Fortunately, the judge saw through the federal government's argument that Lynch deserved five years in prison, and instead sentenced him to the least amount of time he could," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with the national advocacy group Americans for Safe Access (ASA). "Recognizing that Lynch had not violated any state or local laws, the judge was lenient despite the protestations of the federal government." On two of the counts against Lynch, Judge Wu sentenced him to time served.
Lynch's sentencing comes at a time when the Obama Administration has indicated a willingness to develop a new policy on medical marijuana. During his election campaign, President Obama said that he was "not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws" on medical marijuana. That was followed up with statements by newly-appointed U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that the Justice Department would only "go after those people who violate both federal and state law." The Administration's commitment to a new policy on medical marijuana prompted Judge Wu to request written clarification from the government regarding that policy's impact on Lynch's case. However, a response from the Deputy Attorney General's office explained that his case was unaffected.
Continued drug enforcement raids on medical marijuana dispensaries under the Obama Administration has prompted Congress to seek clarification on this new policy. On Tuesday, Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) got report language approved within the Commerce, Justice and Science Departments (CJS) Appropriations bill. "It's imperative that the federal government respect states' rights and stay out of the way of patients with debilitating diseases such as cancer who are using medical marijuana in accordance with state law to alleviate their pain," said Hinchey in a press release issued Tuesday. "We applaud Congressman Hinchey's leadership on this issue and his attempt to restrict interference by the federal government in medical marijuana states," said Caren Woodson, ASA's Director of Government Affairs.
There are more than two dozen pending federal cases like Lynch's for which the government has failed to signal any change in strategy. Advocates contend that the federal government should either cease such prosecutions or , at the very least, remove the cases to state court where medical evidence can properly be heard. Because of the June 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Gonzales v. Raich, federal medical marijuana defendants are prohibited from entering evidence related to medical marijuana or their compliance with local and state laws. Advocates argue that the exclusion of evidence is the reason why Lynch and others are being convicted in federal court.
Before his medical marijuana dispensary was raided by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents in March of 2007, Lynch had operated for 11 months without incident, and with the blessing of the Morro Bay City Council, the local Chamber of Commerce, and other community members. Two months after Lynch closed his dispensary, Central Coast Compassionate Caregivers, he was indicted and charged with conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute marijuana and concentrated cannabis, manufacturing more than 100 plants, knowingly maintaining a drug premises, and sales of marijuana to a person under the age of 21. None of the federal charges Lynch was convicted of constituted violations of local or state law.
Charles C. Lynch Interview with John Stossel: http://www.friendsofccl.com/johnstossel.htm
Friends of Charles C. Lynch website: http://www.friendsofccl.com