CA Supreme Court Denies Medical Marijuana Patients' Right to Work
Advocates to call on state legislature to prevent discriminationSacramento, CA -- The California Supreme Court ruled against
medical marijuana patient Gary Ross today in his fight against
employment discrimination. In a 5-2 decision, the Supreme Court claimed
that Ross could not rely on the Fair Housing and Employment Act or the
state's medical marijuana law to prevent discrimination at the
workplace. The Court did indicate in its decision that the state
legislature had not adequately clarified employment rights of medical
marijuana patients.
"Obviously, we are very disappointed by today's decision," said Joe
Elford, Chief Counsel of Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the medical
marijuana advocacy organization that argued the case. "However, we
remain hopeful that the legislature will come to the aid of patients by
preventing the sort of discrimination that is likely to occur from such
a decision." The dissenting opinion, written by Justice Joyce L.
Kennard, stated that the ruling "has seriously compromised the
Compassionate Use Act, denying to those who must work for a living its
promised benefits."
Despite a clearly worded amicus "friend of the court" brief filed in
support of Ross in
July 2006 by all of the original co-authors of SB 420 (state
legislation that helped to define the rights of medical marijuana
patients), the Supreme Court failed to believe that it was the intent
of
the entire legislature. Advocates assert that they will seek a
different response from the state legislature in the form of a bill
introduced in the next few weeks.
Gary Ross, a 45-year old disabled veteran and a medical marijuana
patient living in Carmichael, California, is at the forefront of a
landmark employment case, with significant ramifications for patients
in California and across the country. Ross was fired in September 2001
for failing an employer-mandated drug test while working as a systems
engineer for RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.
"All I am asking is to be a productive member of society," said
plaintiff Gary Ross. "I was not fired for poor work performance, but
for an antiquated policy on medical marijuana,” continued Ross. “This
practice allows employers to undermine state law and the protections
provided for patients.”
Ross's physician recommended cannabis for chronic back pain that
resulted from injuries sustained during his military service. But
Ross's employer, RagingWire Telecommunications, refused to make an
exception to its policy of terminating anyone testing positive for
marijuana.
Ross filed suit after he was fired in 2001, arguing that RagingWire
illegally discriminated against him because of his condition. However,
a Sacramento Superior Court, and then the Third Appellate District
Court both rejected his argument. In October 2005, ASA appealed to the
California Supreme Court on behalf of Ross. Strong public support has
been shown for Ross and the plight of California patients to seek and
maintain employment.
Since it began recording instances of employment discrimination in
2005, ASA has received hundreds of such reports from across California.
Companies that have either fired patients from their job, threatened
them with termination, or denied them employment because of patient
status or a positive test for marijuana, include Costco Wholesale, UPS,
Foster Farms Dairy, DirecTV, the San Joaquin Courier, Power Auto Group,
as well as several construction companies, hospitals, and various trade
union employers.
Further information:
Today's California Supreme Court decision:
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/Ross_Ruling.pdf
Photo of Gary Ross: http://safeaccessnow.org/img/original/Ross_pic3.jpg
Legislative-based amicus brief:
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/ross_legislative.pdf
Review legal briefs and more about the Ross v. RagingWire case here:
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/Ross


Printer Safe Version
Site Map
Link to Us